HISTORICKÝ ČASOPIS

1/2024

VEDECKÝ ČASOPIS O DEJINÁCH SLOVENSKA A STREDNEJ EURÓPY
VEDECKÝ ČASOPIS O DEJINÁCH SLOVENSKA A STREDNEJ EURÓPY

VYDÁVA HISTORICKÝ ÚSTAV SLOVENSKEJ AKADÉMIE VIED, V. V. I.

ISSN 0018-2575 (print)

ISSN 2585-9099 (online)

EV 3084/09

Creative Commons License

Všetky obsahy sú čitateľom voľne dostupné podľa licencie Creative Commons CC BY 4.0.

Indexovanie a abstraktovanie:

Web of Science Core Collection: Arts & Humanities Citation Index

Additional Web of Science Indexes: Current Contents Arts & Humanities

Scopus

CEEOL

CEJSH

EBSCO Historical Abstracts

ESF (HUM)

AKTUÁLNE ČÍSLO | REDAKCIA | POKYNY PRE AUTOROV | ARCHÍV | PREDPLATNÉ | O ČASOPISE | PUBLIKAČNÁ ETIKA | VÝZVY

 
HURBANIČ, Martin

When Arian Vandals conquered ʽElderʼ Rome…. The Byzantine Authors and Their Views on Church Unity after 1054.

Historický časopis, 2024, 72, 1, pp. 3-23, Bratislava

Abstract: One of the consequences of the so-called Great Schism of 1054 was the establishment of a permanent religious controversy between the Roman Catholic and Orthodox Christians. The contemporaries of this event (Michael Keroullarios and Peter of Antioch) had marginalised its effects on the relations of both churches. Yet, they formulated their views on the issue of religious unity by pushing the origin of the schism deep into the past. Accordingly, we can find later statements in anti-Latin polemics influenced by the events of 1054. Among others, the motif of the religious apostasy of Rome and the alleged corruption of the Latin faith by the Arian Vandals appears here. In so doing, the Byzantine authors wanted to emphasise that it was Rome and its popes who were responsible for the religious purity in their patriarchate, that means, in the administrative area of the Latin West. According to the Byzantine ethnography, various barbarians represented the same entity, regardless of their respective name. Subsequently, the non-distinction between the ethnonyms Goths, Vandals, and Franks by the Byzantine authors made it possible to introduce a further motif, that of another Vandal/German/Frankish capture of Rome. However, the Byzantine authors did not have in mind any specific military occupation, but rather the rise to power of the Ottonians from the middle of the 10th century, as well as their influence on both the policies and beliefs of the Roman popes. Building on the aforementioned, the analysed texts indicate how Byzantine church officials perceived the relations between the two churches after the critical year 1054.

Keywords: Anti-Latin Polemics. Arian Vandals. Schism of 1054. Michael Keroullarios. Peter of Antioch. Orthodox Church.

DOI: https://doi.org/10.31577/histcaso.2024.72.1.1

PDF DOWNLOAD / Plný text


Google
 

Do Vašej pozornosti ďalej odporúčame:
Historický ústav SAV | História Revue | Forum Historiae | Historické štúdie | Slovanské štúdie | SNKH | Slovenská historická spoločnosť pri SAV | SDKSVE pri SAV | Dejiny.sk


Historický časopis - Virtuálne študovne


Historický časopis, 1953 - 2024 / Design by Mgr. Peter Krákorník
ROČNÍK 72 * 2024

Ochrana osobných údajov